-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validate run for both ref and spec as nil. #3977
Conversation
Previously we had the check for an empty RunSpec but a RunSpec could be missing both Ref and Spec and yet contain some other field. This validation check was missing.
Hi @ScrapCodes. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a tektoncd member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/assign @pritidesai |
/ok-to-test |
The following is the coverage report on the affected files.
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbwsg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
thanks a bunch @ScrapCodes for following up 🙏 /lgtm |
Previously we had the check for an empty RunSpec but a RunSpec
could be missing both Ref and Spec and yet contain some other
field. This validation check was missing.
Changes
Added validation for both Ref and spec missing.
And a test to test then newly added validation.
#3901 (comment)
/kind bug
Submitter Checklist
As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:
functionality, content, code)
Release Notes